Best of Vail

Call Now

Denver: (303) 331-1700 | Vail Valley: (970) 926-1700
Frisco: (970) 855-2355 | Park Meadows: (303) 331-9500
Ask a Question

Helping Coloradoans For Over 30 Years

The Other Driver is Blaming Me for the Accident

Bloch & Chapleau Sep 25th, 2017 Personal Injury

If you were recently involved in a serious car accident in Denver or Eagle County, it can be difficult to think about anything but your injuries and your recovery. We know how frustrating it can be to get hurt in a severe crash caused by another driver’s negligence. When you know the other driver bears responsibility for the collision, what should you do if that driver decides to blame you for the accident?

When the other driver says you are responsible for the crash that caused your injuries, it is important to reach out to an experienced Denver car accident lawyer as soon as possible. If a court decides you do bear some liability for the collision, you still may be able to recover damages.

Understanding Contributory Negligence In Colorado.

Do Not Admit Fault After the Crash

If you think you bear some responsibility for an accident, it’s important that you never admit fault after the crash. Immediately after the accident happens, you may be in contact with the other driver. You also will be speaking to your own insurance company. No matter what, only give the facts that you know.

If you are asked about your opinion, and who you think might be liable for the collision, you should avoid providing any subjective information until you have spoken with your lawyer.

Understanding Comparative Fault in Colorado

While plaintiffs who are partially to blame for an accident still may be able to obtain compensation for their losses, it is better to avoid giving the defendant any information to use against you. In short, the defendant may blame you for the accident in order to avoid paying anything at all. This is where is it important to understand contributory negligence in Colorado.

Under Colorado law (C.R.S. 13-21-111), contributory negligence is not a complete bar to recovery as long as the plaintiff’s negligence is “not as great as the negligence of the person against whom recovery is sought.” As long as this is the case, the plaintiff can recover. However, her damages will be diminished by her percentage of responsibility. Now, what does this mean in practice? As long as a plaintiff is not 50 percent or more to blame, she can obtain damages from the defendant. However, her damages award will be reduced by her percentage of the blame.


To better understand, we can take a look at a hypothetical example. Imagine that Sheila is driving in downtown Denver. She gets seriously hurt in a car crash after a motor vehicle traveling at 100mph crashes into her. As it turns out, Sheila was somewhat distracted when the accident happened. She had been reaching into the glove box to pull out her GPS. At trial, the defendant blames Sheila and says her distracted driving should bar her recovery.

The jury decides that the defendant’s speeding was the primary cause of the accident. The jury says Sheila is 20 percent to blame. Sheila is awarded $500,000 in total, but her award needs to be reduced by her percentage of the contributory negligence. As such, Sheila recovers $400,000 (20 percent of $500,000 = $100,000, which is the amount by which Sheila’s award will be reduced). If the jury had said Sheila was 50 percent or more to blame, she would not have been able to recover anything.

Seek Advice from a Denver Car Accident Attorney

Are you being blamed for a car accident in which the other driver was negligent? A Denver car accident attorney can assist with your case. An advocate at Bloch & Chapleau can speak with you today about your options. Contact us today to learn more about how we can help.

Free Case Evaluation

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.